Two security administrators were asked at the same time to add different security rules to limit web servers access, and block the upload function of Zoom video conferencing.
😀
😡
😡
😡
Up to
x4
Faster
Up to
45
Fewer clicks
Up to
x5
Reduction in menus
Challenge Summary
Time
Clicks
Menus
00:24
67
2
01:34
82
10
01:26
61
5
01:20
97
10
Challenge 5
The admins completed this challenge concurrently without any conflict
Check Point Security Management enables the administrators to work in parallel without interrupting each other within the same rulebase and even in the same security rule. Support of concurrency between admins increases productivity.
time
00:24
clicks
67
Menus
2
How it’s done with Check Point
😀
Challenge 5
The second admin could begin working only after the first admin completed their task
Palo Alto Networks management inteface holds an inherent security risk when two administrators work on the same policy, as it may lead to unintentional policy configrations. Thus, this challenge could not be performed simultaneously.
x4 faster
00:24
time
01:34
67
click
82
2
menus
10
How it’s done with PAN
😀
😡
Challenge 5
The second admin could begin working only after the first admin completed their task
Fortigate management best practice recommends for multiple administrators to not work concurrently on the same security policy due to lack of policy validation.
In FortiManager, it is only possible to lock the administrative domain and not the specific policy, rules or objects. Thus this challenge could not be performed simultaneously.
x3 faster
00:24
time
01:26
67
click
61
2
menus
5
How it’s done with Fortinet
😀
😡
Challenge 5
The second admin could begin working only after the first admin completed their task
Cisco Firepower management does not allow multiple administrators to work concurrently on the same security policy. Thus, this challenge could not be performed simultaneously.